A blog for all things floating in our atmosphere.
Wednesday | December 16th | 2009
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/16/arts/16pavic.html?_r=1&hpw

Milorad Pavic, Serbian Author of Novel Novels, Dies at 80

The author of my very favorite book has passed away. I was so fervently hoping for something new before he passed, but I’ll be content to re-read his masterpiece “The Dictionary of the Khazars” again and again. And it’s easy to re-read his work, considering how he built his novels:

“An academic whose field, perhaps unsurprisingly, was philosophy, Mr. Pavic taught for many years at the University of Belgrade. Dreamlike, playful and formally unorthodox, his novels were like hardbound hypertext in their insistence on offering readers alternate, nonlinear ways of navigating a story.

Mr. Pavic’s narratives do away with the forced-march, page-after-page strategy to which most readers are accustomed. They are profuse with self-reference, unreliable narration, authorial asides and “Rashomon”-like shifts in point of view. Stories nest within stories like the pieces of a Russian doll.

Mr. Pavic’s next novel, “Landscape Painted With Tea” (Knopf, 1990; translated by Ms. Pribicevic-Zoric), is partly organized as a crossword puzzle, with alternating sections titled “Across” and “Down.” Readers may approach the book chronologically by reading only the “Across” sections, or less chronologically and with more digressions by reading the “Down” sections. Either strategy gradually reveals the story of a soul-searching architect who roams a labyrinth of meditation and memory.”

Yes, books built like lexicons with interlocking entries, books to be “solved” like crossword puzzles, even books based on tarot cards to be interpreted in different patterns. Even though he has passed on, he has left a mysterious, beautiful literary legacy for us to untangle and solve as many times as we wish.


Posted by various vapor, assembled. on Wed Dec 16th at 3:44AM
Permalink | Comments (View)
Tuesday | October 27th | 2009

The first webcomic I ever read was a slightly messy, totally lovable black and white affair, painstakingly drawn every week by a college student with a chronic case of carpal tunnel. It was about vampires in the French Revolution.

Don’t laugh! Or do, as it was utterly hilarious. That was back in 2000, and while Bite Me! has lain completed since 2004, Dylan Meconis’ poor wrist is still taking a beating.

Ten years later and she’s still at it—this time sans vampires, and hopefully sans carpal tunnel. Her current opus-in-progress is Family Man, which concerns the life of a fictitious German theologian as he travels Europe in 1768. When Luther Levy finds employment in a university filled with eccentric professors and a mysterious librarian, he begins to wonder where Reason will lead him after all.

What, that doesn’t sound funny? It’s not meant to be. No daily punchlines, no anachronistic references, and the only puns are those on Christian theology. In German. Nevertheless, it is one of the most audacious, illuminating and entertaining pieces I have ever had the pleasure of reading (online and otherwise). Granted, that’s coming from a history geek, but the sumptuous art and underlying mysteries should be tempting enough for any reader to jump on board. Wagon. Carriage. Whatever.

Exhaustively researched, skillfully drawn and intelligently written, Meconis is slowly unveiling her vision of the Age of Enlightenment through her rain-washed art and crackling scholastic debate. Even her research notes sparkle with wit and energy; whether she’s lamenting a dearth of accurate carriage designs on the web or apologizing for depicting a prop that wasn’t invented til a decade later.

Updating only once a week, Family Man isn’t a marathon comic: there are a grand total of two full chapters thus far, and once you’ve read them the wait seems interminable for the next page. However, when you recognize the detail she puts into her work (one notable example above) you can appreciate why each page takes a full week to come to completion.

But, if Bite Me! was any indication, this artist has the tenacity and vision to take us along on the journey all the way to the end of her epic. Read up on Spinoza and Voltaire, savor the artwork, and join a loyal readership as they follow the stately progression that is Family Man.


Posted by various vapor, assembled. on Tue Oct 27th at 11:15PM
Permalink | Comments (View)
Thursday | July 9th | 2009
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/10/world/europe/10france.html?_r=1&hp

Tracing Roots Fostered by War, Severed by Shame -- NY Times Online

“The so-called enfants de Boches — roughly, children of the Huns — born during the war to French women and German soldiers, are seeking to fill a hole in their lives, hunting for long-lost German fathers they never knew and speaking openly of the maltreatment they suffered from their French neighbors. It is estimated that 200,000 children were born of these wartime love affairs.

Photos of the time depict young women, their heads shorn in shame, being hounded through villages, clutching the children of German fathers. About 20,000 women had their heads shaved. Many rejected the children, gave them up for adoption or placed them in orphanages.

But now these children, in their late 60s, are struggling to put their lives in order while there is still time. They have formed an association and sought the help of the German and French governments to try to identify their fathers, in many cases already dead, or families that their fathers founded in Germany after the war.”

Absolutely fascinating article on the children—now into their late middle-age—born to French women and German soldiers during World War II. According to the Times article, Germany has just begun issuing dual-citizenship to any child born of the two nationalities, signaling an acceptance of the liaisons. Of course, most of the negative feeling is on the French side, so the olive branch is somewhat nonplussing.


Posted by various vapor, assembled. on Thu Jul 9th at 11:21PM
Permalink | Comments (View)
Thursday | May 21st | 2009
From HistoryLink.org, an encyclopedia of Washington history, comes this bemused  report on a 1952 “pantie raid” at the U.W.:

“Night after night from coast to coast,” Time reported, “college boys leaped and howled like Comanches under the windows of squealing coeds.” The UW “disturbance” began at about 10:30 p.m. on a Tuesday night, when approximately 70 male students entered Austin Hall, a women’s on-campus residence…Students shouted “We want panties!” as they tried to force their way into the women’s quarters. By 10:45 p.m., the crowd was estimated at 300, and a few minutes later at 700. By 11:15 p.m., about 1,000 “marauding college boys” had joined the party.
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reported that at least 20 city police cars stood by in the vicinity but the officers did not enter the fray because of some confusion over the chain of command. At least one officer said he was staying in his car because he was afraid of what would happen to it if he left. In any case, “the raiders went unmolested”
Few panties were actually taken in either raid, but that was almost beside the point. The goal was to make a commotion and annoy the authorities.

Take a gander at the words used in this article. The male students are dubbed “pranksters,” “raiders,” which flippantly dismisses the fact that they were using force to enter women’s dorms at nearly midnight. The words marauders, disturbance appear in quotes, and the entire incident is chalked up to the boys wanting to annoy the authorities. Sure, that’s the reason.
The tone is completely patronizing, even amused: The policeman doesn’t want to go help because he’s afraid of something happening to his car, well shucks! Using the phrases “a commotion” and “a mild affair” to depict female students desperately fighting off possibly drunken hordes of men with broom handles and water hoses? Oh, brother, what a ruckus! And, excuse me, but “the raiders went unmolested?” Good, we wouldn’t want any disciplinary or police action against them, would we?
Can you imagine the lawsuits and sexual harrassment charges that would be slapped on every student who tried this stunt at today’s UW campus? Expulsions, charges, mace to the face and who knows what else would ensue. Let’s see them write up that article with a flippant, “boys will be boys” tone. Stick with setting couches on fire, boys, at least they can’t sue your ass at the end of the night.

I heard about this from the Stranger blog, but I couldn’t resist writing a bit about it.

From HistoryLink.org, an encyclopedia of Washington history, comes this bemused report on a 1952 “pantie raid” at the U.W.:

“Night after night from coast to coast,” Time reported, “college boys leaped and howled like Comanches under the windows of squealing coeds.” The UW “disturbance” began at about 10:30 p.m. on a Tuesday night, when approximately 70 male students entered Austin Hall, a women’s on-campus residence…Students shouted “We want panties!” as they tried to force their way into the women’s quarters. By 10:45 p.m., the crowd was estimated at 300, and a few minutes later at 700. By 11:15 p.m., about 1,000 “marauding college boys” had joined the party.

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reported that at least 20 city police cars stood by in the vicinity but the officers did not enter the fray because of some confusion over the chain of command. At least one officer said he was staying in his car because he was afraid of what would happen to it if he left. In any case, “the raiders went unmolested”

Few panties were actually taken in either raid, but that was almost beside the point. The goal was to make a commotion and annoy the authorities.

Take a gander at the words used in this article. The male students are dubbed “pranksters,” “raiders,” which flippantly dismisses the fact that they were using force to enter women’s dorms at nearly midnight. The words marauders, disturbance appear in quotes, and the entire incident is chalked up to the boys wanting to annoy the authorities. Sure, that’s the reason.

The tone is completely patronizing, even amused: The policeman doesn’t want to go help because he’s afraid of something happening to his car, well shucks! Using the phrases “a commotion” and “a mild affair” to depict female students desperately fighting off possibly drunken hordes of men with broom handles and water hoses? Oh, brother, what a ruckus! And, excuse me, but “the raiders went unmolested?” Good, we wouldn’t want any disciplinary or police action against them, would we?

Can you imagine the lawsuits and sexual harrassment charges that would be slapped on every student who tried this stunt at today’s UW campus? Expulsions, charges, mace to the face and who knows what else would ensue. Let’s see them write up that article with a flippant, “boys will be boys” tone. Stick with setting couches on fire, boys, at least they can’t sue your ass at the end of the night.


I heard about this from the Stranger blog, but I couldn’t resist writing a bit about it.


Posted by various vapor, assembled. on Thu May 21st at 12:52PM
Permalink | Comments (View)

Herders

Leif writes words, music, code and bug reports; somehow he's still sane.

Nickherder is a science and engineering kind of guy, but we forgive him for it.

SaRRa is using her fancy university degree to blog.


Contributors

Legal Drug makes the coffee, eats the food and drinks the booze.

Legal

Layout & design by Leif Chappelle.
Logo by Sam Lewontin.
Unless otherwise expressly stated, all text in this blog and any related pages, including the blog's archives, is licensed by the authors of Cloudherder under a Creative Commons Attribution License.